01
Nova Poshta
Updates across several language editions
Updated the article in several language editions of Wikipedia.
Results
Wikipedia page creation case studies: most clients are under NDA
Since 2010 we have delivered projects for 4,000+ clients, almost all under NDA. We show a few projects by name and the rest without names. Every figure comes with its counting method, and before you sign we provide an evidence pack under a mutual NDA.
// named projects · cases without names · the rest under a mutual NDA
Case cardname approvedname under NDA
- Client
- Nova PoshtaEuropean biotech companyKyivstarPublic figure
- Article
- Company article, several language editionsCompany article, English WikipediaCompany article, Ukrainian WikipediaBiographical article
- Dates
- several yearsrange of yearssince October 2020range of years
- Task
- Updates across several language editions
- Result
- Updated successfully. The article stands in several language editions.
- Task
- Defending the article in a deletion discussion
- Result
- The article was kept; the client is on annual support.
- Task
- Update and language versions
- Result
- The updated version has stood for over 6 years.
- Task
- Restoring a deleted article
- Result
- The article was restored; no new nominations since.
We reveal names only with the client's permission or under a mutual NDA
In NDA cases there is no text under the black bars: the names of these clients and articles are not even in the page code.
01 Numbers
Wikipedia page creation results: four numbers and how we count them
Confidentiality limits what we can say about an individual client. It does not limit aggregate figures. Under each one we say exactly what it includes.
2010
year founded
How we countWe have worked without a break since 2010. The team is in Kyiv; projects are run remotely.
4,000+
clients
How we countClients, not articles: companies, startups, non-profits and private individuals. There are many more articles and projects, because for some clients we built several language versions and separate articles on a product, an executive or a foundation.
1,000+
articles in the last year
How we countPublished articles across all language editions together. Edits to existing articles are not included.
93%*
of the pages we create pass Wikipedia's review and are published
How we countThe share of creation projects accepted after a sources review. Full breakdown ↓
160+Wikipedia language editions we work in
5,000+edits a year: updating and maintaining existing articles
Source: internal record of completed projects, 2010 to Q3 2026. The figures are cumulative and reviewed once a year (last review: November 2026). They are aggregate historical data, not a promise for any single project.
02 Corporations
Corporate clients: Fortune Global 500 groups and companies of the leading stock indices
5Fortune Global 500 groups
11groups from leading stock indices
7world stock indices
Our projects include work for subsidiaries and divisions. A group can fall into more than one category. Data as of November 2026.
Indices these groups belong to
- S&P 500
- DAX
- CAC 40
- IBEX 35
- Nifty 50
- TA-35
- Nikkei 225
We do not publish group names. We count groups, not individual articles, so a corporation with a dozen subsidiaries counts as one.
03 Projects
Wikipedia articles we have worked on: creation, updates, maintenance
Creation, updates, rebuilds, maintenance. Hover over a card or press “Article” to see how it looks on Wikipedia.
02
Kyivstar
Update and language versions
We updated the article on the operator and its versions in other languages.
6+years the updated version has stood
20202026
03
Darnytsia
Editing and language versions
Edited and updated the article in several language editions.
on request
Three more named projects
Leave your name and work e-mail. We will send a letter with a link: once you confirm your e-mail, the projects open on this page.
- 04Name hiddenLarge-scale update and rebuildReal estate and funds
- 05Name hiddenImprovement and language versionsTechnology and mobility
- 06Name hiddenCreation from scratchTechnology
- 07Name hiddenArticle updateFintech
- 08Name hiddenCreation and maintenanceSecurity systems
Letter sent to
- Open the letter from WikiBusines. Subject: “Confirm your e-mail to open the projects”.
- Click “Confirm and open the projects” in the letter. The link is valid for 24 hours.
- You will return to this page, and the three projects open on their own. On this device they stay open for 30 days.
The letter arrives within two minutes. Cannot see it? Check your Spam and Promotions folders.
e-mail confirmed
Thank you, . Here are three more projects
Cases in your industry, documents and a conversation with a former client we show after a mutual NDA.
Request the NDA packCompany descriptions and card fields are taken from their Wikipedia articles. The back of a card is a schematic of the article, not a screenshot.
04 Case finder
Wikipedia page creation case studies: filter by task and sector
Six anonymised cases. Choose a task and a sector: the filter also shows named projects, and if nothing matches we will show a private case under NDA.
Task
Sector
Showing all 6 anonymised cases
Technology · article creation
A B2B SaaS company at Series B
- Start
- There was no English Wikipedia article yet.
- What we did
- An article in English Wikipedia and a Wikidata entry.
- Result
- Published successfully; the article stands.
What we show under NDA in this case
- The sources review conclusion before the start
- A list of Wikidata statements with a source for each
- The 90-day monitoring report after publication
Biotech and medicine · defence
A European biotech company
- Start
- The existing article was nominated for deletion.
- What we did
- We defended the article in the deletion discussion.
- Result
- The discussion closed as “keep”. The article stands and the client is on annual support.
What we show under NDA in this case
- The discussion archive with our arguments
- The table of sources cited in the discussion
- The annual support plan after the defence
Logistics and industry · several languages
A logistics group
- Start
- The target language editions had no articles on the group.
- What we did
- We launched articles in several language editions. Each rests on local independent sources.
- Result
- Published successfully in several language editions.
What we show under NDA in this case
- The release calendar of the language versions
- A source matrix for each language separately
- The change log in each edition
NGOs and think tanks · source preparation
A think tank
- Start
- The notability audit showed there were too few independent publications for a safe attempt.
- What we did
- A notability audit, then a source preparation programme, then the article.
- Timeline
- The article was published in month five.
- Result
- Published successfully after the source preparation programme.
What we show under NDA in this case
- The audit report with a “not yet” verdict
- The source preparation plan and a list of the publications that came out
- The source matrix before and after the programme
Consumer brands · mentions and AI
A consumer brand
- Start
- Before the programme there were no recorded citations of the brand in AI answers.
- What we did
- A monthly programme on Reddit and Quora.
- Timeline
- First results within 60 days; the programme continues month by month.
- Result
- The first recorded citations appeared in AI answers.
What we show under NDA in this case
- The log of posts and replies in the communities
- The measurement protocol: queries, dates, saved AI answers
- Monthly programme reports
Public figures · restoration
A public figure
- Start
- The article had been deleted earlier.
- What we did
- We rewrote the article with new sources and had it restored. Monitoring continues.
- Result
- The article was restored. No new deletion nominations since.
What we show under NDA in this case
- An analysis of why the first deletion happened
- The new source matrix for the restored version
- Monitoring alerts after the restoration
No anonymised case
We will show a private case under NDA
There is no anonymised case on the site for this combination of task and sector. Check the named projects under the filter below, or send a request: we will pick the closest case under a mutual NDA.
Named projects under this filter
The cases are real, the details are blurred: a region instead of a country, “several editions” instead of a list of languages, no dates or names. Each result describes what happened in that case, not what we promise in yours.
Representative work
- 01Published an English Wikipedia article on a B2B SaaS company together with a Wikidata entry.
- 02Defended the article of a European biotech company in a deletion discussion.
- 03Launched a logistics group in several Wikipedia language editions in the markets where it operates.
- 04Prepared sources for a think tank after an audit with a “not yet” verdict, then published the article.
- 05Ran a Reddit and Quora programme for a consumer brand up to the first recorded AI citations.
- 06Restored a deleted article on a public figure with new sources.
05 Evidence room
Evidence of results under NDA: three access levels
The higher the access level, the more specific the material and the stricter the terms. Confidential material is verifiable where possible.
Aggregate figures with the counting method
publicGuarantee and refund terms
publicPress coverage of WikiBusines
publicThree named projects
publicSix cases without names and the list of documents in each
publicThree more named projects
on requestNamed cases in your industry
under NDASource matrix and change log with sensitive fields masked
under NDAMonitoring reports
under NDAContact of a former client or partner agency for a conversation
under NDA
Anyone can see this, no request
Aggregate figures with the counting method, three named projects, six cases without names, the guarantee and refund terms, and press coverage of us. You can check all of it without talking to us.
Opened for a name and e-mail
Three more named projects. Leave your name and work e-mail and they open right on this page.
Opened after a mutual NDA
Named cases in your industry, the source matrix and change log with sensitive fields masked, monitoring reports, and the contact of a former client or partner agency for a conversation.
Request the NDA packWhy your article will not be in our portfolio
In our niche a public portfolio works as a target list: the articles in it get nominated for deletion and vandalised. So we show only a few projects by name and keep the rest under NDA. The same discretion will protect your article.
Why an NDA with penalties
A mutual NDA carries penalties for disclosure. They are what protects our clients' data from leaking, so without a signed agreement we open neither names nor documents.
06 93% honestly
Wikipedia page moderation, 93 out of 100: what stands behind the number
93 passed Wikipedia's review and were published7 did not
After 90 days:to the client's balanceunder our maintenance
Of 100 pages we create, 93 passed Wikipedia's review and were published.
What we count
Article creation projects in all language editions that were accepted after a sources review. Success: the page passed Wikipedia's review and was published.
What we do not count
Requests we turned down at the sources review: they are not in the hundred. Editing, defence and work outside Wikipedia: the figure is about creation only.
What about the rest
If a published article is deleted within 90 days, we make up to three restoration attempts. If that fails, we refund 80% of the project cost.
An aggregate historical figure from our internal records. It is not a promise for any single project: the result depends on the sources.
07 Anatomy of a case
What Wikipedia page creation looks like: from the first letter to day 90
Three cases on one timeline. At each stage you see only the documents that really exist in that case.
Day 0
Request
Client briefStage 2
Sources review
Conclusion: the sources are enoughStage 3
Draft
Draft and source matrixStage 4
Editor review
Log of comments and editsWeek 6
Publication
Article and Wikidata entryDay 90
Monitoring
Monitoring report: the article standsNext
Annual support
Only with an annual package
Day 0
Request
Client briefStage 2
Notability audit
Audit report: “not yet”Stage 3
Source preparation
Plan and list of publicationsStage 4
Draft and review
Source matrix before and afterMonth 5
Publication
Published articleDay 90
Monitoring
Monitoring alertsNext
Annual support
Only with an annual package
Day 0
Request
Deletion nominationStage 2
Nomination analysis
Arguments and source tableStage 3
Draft
None: the article already existedStage 4
Discussion
Discussion archiveOutcome
Decision “keep”
Discussion closing summary90 days
Monitoring
Included in annual support12 months
Annual support
Support plan and guarantee
Standard: 90 days of monitoring and guarantee. 12 months only with an annual package.Annual support: terms and packages →
Documents are marked with a lock: this is a list, not scans. We show the documents themselves under NDA.
08 Industries and reach
Wikipedia pages by industry: eight scenarios, 160+ language editions
The result rarely depends on the industry: independent sources decide it. But every sector has its own typical path.
SaaS and technology
Funded startups and mature companies. An English article as soon as the sources allow it, and a Wikidata entry from day one.
Fintech
Payments, banking infrastructure, companies next to crypto. Source requirements are stricter, so we start with a notability assessment.
Biotech and medicine
Clinical-stage companies and health-tech. Conservative sources, careful wording and defence when editors review an article.
Logistics and industry
Carriers, manufacturers, infrastructure groups. Often several languages: articles in the editions of the markets where the group operates.
NGOs and think tanks
Institutes, foundations, public organisations. Independent publications first, then the article, not the other way round.
Agencies and media
Agencies and production companies, often on white-label terms: we do the Wikipedia work, they keep the client relationship.
Investors and funds
Venture firms, funds, private investors. Articles on firms and partners, updated when funds close.
Public figures
Executives, authors, athletes, officials, candidates. Stricter notability rules for people and monitoring as standard.
These are the most common scenarios, not limits: we also work with FMCG, real estate, hotels and e-commerce. Can my company have a Wikipedia article? →
overviewWhole world160+ language editionsEU · Europe50° N · 10° EUS · North America39° N · 98° WUK · United Kingdom54° N · 2° WMENA · Middle East27° N · 35° EAPAC · Asia and Oceania20° N · 115° E
Most projects
- 80+
- countries with our clients and partners
- 160+
- Wikipedia language editions, English first
- We work remotely from Kyiv since 2010. About the company → Prices by language →
09 Verification
How to check a Wikipedia page creation agency: three steps before a contract
A page without logos should not be believed on its word. Here are the three steps by which we are checked.
Request
Your sector, goal and what has already been written about you. A short e-mail or one call; no presentation needed.
Mutual NDA
We sign a non-disclosure agreement that binds both sides and carries penalties for a leak. Then we send the pack: named cases from your industry and working documents with sensitive fields masked.
Reference call
We arrange a conversation with a former client or partner agency that has agreed to it. We do not compile a list of names on demand: it is the same confidentiality that will protect you.
Case studies and confidentiality: FAQ NDA, industries, evidence pack
Can I see cases with client names?
A few projects on this page are shown by name, and that is a deliberate exception. Almost every project runs under NDA, and Wikipedia work is sensitive to conflict of interest, so we do not publish full client lists, logo walls or named testimonials. We show the rest anonymously, and after a mutual NDA: named cases from your industry and a conversation with a former client who has agreed to it.
Do you work in my industry?
Very likely. Since 2010 we have served 4,000+ clients: SaaS, fintech, biotech, logistics, consumer brands, non-profits, funds, agencies, public figures. The real question is rarely the industry. It is whether there are enough independent publications about you. A notability audit answers that, before you spend on a draft.
Do you work with private individuals or only companies?
Both. Companies, startups, non-profits and agencies on one side; founders, executives, investors, authors, athletes and politicians on the other. Wikipedia applies stricter notability rules to articles about people, so the assessment matters even more there.
How do you keep things confidential?
An NDA is standard before we see your materials. Engagement details, sources and drafts stay between us. On the Wikipedia side we follow the platform's conflict-of-interest and disclosure requirements: discretion towards you, transparency towards the platform. The two are compatible, and we keep both.
Where are you based?
Kyiv, Ukraine. We have worked since 2010 and serve clients worldwide. The work is fully remote: clients and partners in 80+ countries, English plus 160+ Wikipedia language editions.
What is in the NDA pack and when will I get it?
Named cases from your industry, a source matrix and change log with sensitive fields masked, monitoring reports, and the contact of a former client or partner agency who agreed to a conversation. We send the pack once both sides have signed the NDA. The agreement is mutual and carries penalties for disclosure: they protect client data from leaking.
GuaranteesThe 93% and 80% terms behind every case.Wikipedia for companiesThe same path these cases followed.How to vet an agency in 15 minutesUs included: the checklist.Wikipedia over five years: counting the returnWhy a maintained article outlives paid search and PR retainers.The 10 best Wikipedia agencies of 2026A sourced comparison: prices, disclosure, timelines.How to choose a Wikipedia agencyThe checks serious buyers run in 2026.
Request the NDA case pack: describe your situation, we show the closest case
A short brief is enough: your sector, your goal and what has already been written about you. In return you get the closest case and an honest view of whether yours is realistic.